Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 19:56:46 +0200 From: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> To: Mario Lobo <lobo@bsd.com.br> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFT][patch] Scheduling for HTT and not only Message-ID: <4F525B5E.2010402@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <mailpost.1330795470.6530277.76691.mailing.freebsd.hackers@FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw> References: <4F52473A.3080101@FreeBSD.org> <mailpost.1330795470.6530277.76691.mailing.freebsd.hackers@FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03.03.2012 18:57, Mario Lobo wrote: > On Saturday 03 March 2012 13:30:50 Alexander Motin wrote: >> On 03.03.2012 17:26, Ivan Klymenko wrote: >>> I have FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r232253M >>> Patch in r232454 broken my DRM >>> My system patched http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/drm/all.13.5.patch >>> After build kernel with only r232454 patch Xorg log contains: >>> ... >>> [ 504.865] [drm] failed to load kernel module "i915" >>> [ 504.865] (EE) intel(0): [drm] Failed to open DRM device for >>> pci:0000:00:02.0: File exists [ 504.865] (EE) intel(0): Failed to >>> become DRM master. >>> [ 504.865] (**) intel(0): Depth 24, (--) framebuffer bpp 32 >>> [ 504.865] (==) intel(0): RGB weight 888 >>> [ 504.865] (==) intel(0): Default visual is TrueColor >>> [ 504.865] (**) intel(0): Option "DRI" "True" >>> [ 504.865] (**) intel(0): Option "TripleBuffer" "True" >>> [ 504.865] (II) intel(0): Integrated Graphics Chipset: Intel(R) >>> Sandybridge Mobile (GT2) [ 504.865] (--) intel(0): Chipset: >>> "Sandybridge Mobile (GT2)" >>> and black screen... >>> >>> do not even know why it happened ... :( >> >> I've just rebuilt my Core2Duo laptop with r232454 and have no any >> problem with Xorg and (at least old) Intel video driver. Now writing >> this mail from it. Now started rebuilding of my home server. I am not >> sure how this change can cause such specific effect. Are you sure you >> haven't changed anything else unexpectedly? > > I'd like to test the patch on my 8.2-STABLE desktop. > Phenom II quad / 16 GRam > > I have sched.htt40.patch here. Is this the latest? It is, mostly. Code committed to the HEAD was slightly modified. Here is the patch as it is in SVN: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/kern/sched_ule.c?r1=229429&r2=232207&view=patch And today I've fixed one found bug: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/kern/sched_ule.c?r1=232207&r2=232454&view=patch > Will it apply cleanly on it? > Any "gotchas"? Sorry, I have no idea about difference from 8-STABLE. You may try. -- Alexander Motin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F525B5E.2010402>