From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 06:16:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7389616A4D2 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 06:16:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC5DF43D1F for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 06:16:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely5.cicely.de (cicely5.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301:200:92ff:fe9b:20e7]) (authenticated bits=0) i1DEG4rQ064542 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:16:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (cicely12.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301::12]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1DEFtuL057093 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:15:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1DEFsc5036037; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:15:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i1DEFrqn036036; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:15:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:15:53 +0100 From: Bernd Walter To: "Marc G. Fournier" Message-ID: <20040213141551.GF44313@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <200402091130.05656.craig@tobuj.gank.org> <20040209185105.O72949@fw.reifenberger.com> <20040212164236.D96890@ganymede.hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040212164236.D96890@ganymede.hub.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely12.cicely.de 5.2-CURRENT alpha User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Report: * -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on cicely5.cicely.de cc: Craig Boston cc: Michael Reifenberger cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Subversion/CVS experiment summary X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:16:10 -0000 On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 04:48:25PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > note that this was pre-0.34, but since its still "under development", > there is always the chance that this happens again ... a load of the > system took 49hrs, I believe was mentioned ... how long to dump/reload the > system once its already "in subvsersion" format? dump/load is quite fast, but dump format includes the full content of each revision - piping to gzip befor storing is advised for big trees. dump format can easily used to distribute the tree by taking hourly snaps, but not for distribution of checkouts as CVSup can do. Unfortunatley general speed is still an issue. Try to commit a very large diff and you wait forever if you are not going out of memory bevor. There are also obscure workdir problems from time to time which could easily confuse the wide user base. -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de ticso@bwct.de info@bwct.de