From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 6 17:56:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7733016A4DF for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 17:56:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org) Received: from smtp-out3.tiscali.nl (smtp-out3.tiscali.nl [195.241.79.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD0243D6B for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 17:56:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org) Received: from [82.171.39.195] (helo=guido.klop.ws) by smtp-out3.tiscali.nl with smtp (Tiscali http://www.tiscali.nl) id 1FyY5c-00067a-Aq for ; Thu, 06 Jul 2006 19:56:36 +0200 Received: (qmail 73194 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2006 17:56:34 -0000 Received: from localhost.thuis.klop.ws (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.thuis.klop.ws with SMTP; 6 Jul 2006 17:56:34 -0000 Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 19:56:34 +0200 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: "Ronald Klop" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20060704212432.GA57426@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <44AB0C96.3090400@samsco.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <44AB0C96.3090400@samsco.org> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.00 (FreeBSD) Subject: Re: NFS Locking Issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 17:56:39 -0000 On Wed, 05 Jul 2006 02:49:26 +0200, Scott Long wrote: > Michel Talon wrote: > >>> BTW, I noticed yesterday that that IPv6 support committ to rpc.lockd >>> was never backed out. An immediate question for people experiencing >>> new rpc.lockd problems with 6.x should be whether or not backing out >>> that change helps. >> So it may be relevant to say that i have kernels without IPV6 support. >> Recall that i have absolutely no problem with the client in FreeBSD-6.1. >> Tomorrow i will test one of the 6.1 machines as a NFS server and the >> other as >> a client, and will make you know if i see something. >> As to the problems you mention about NFS Linux, yes i have seen a lot >> since >> years. But to my surprise FC5 seems to work well. By the way it is >> kernel >> 2.6.16 so sufficiently recent for the problems to have been ironed out, >> presumably. >> > > 2.6.16 should be OK. I've heard of problems with cookie and handle > sizes with it, but only under highly unusual circumstances. > > Scott Just for the record. I'm running a 6.1-STABLE client with a Debian 3.1 server with kernel 2.6.12 and that works ok with nfs locking. Locking didn't work in the past (6.0-STABLE). Ronald. -- Ronald Klop Amsterdam, The Netherlands