From owner-freebsd-current Thu Dec 30 1:24: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from overcee.netplex.com.au (overcee.netplex.com.au [202.12.86.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56A315243; Thu, 30 Dec 1999 01:24:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Received: from netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.netplex.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42BEA1CC6; Thu, 30 Dec 1999 17:23:52 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: obrien@FreeBSD.org Cc: Amancio Hasty , current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: gcc compile error In-Reply-To: Message from "David O'Brien" of "Wed, 29 Dec 1999 18:58:08 PST." <19991229185808.C16090@dragon.nuxi.com> Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 17:23:52 +0800 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <19991230092352.42BEA1CC6@overcee.netplex.com.au> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "David O'Brien" wrote: > On Wed, Dec 29, 1999 at 11:37:18AM -0800, Amancio Hasty wrote: > > This is the scoop. > ..snip.. > > gcc -v > > Using builtin specs. > > gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release) > ..snip.. > > Without -O or -O2 the program compiles okay. > > What other platforms w/gcc 2.95 have you tried to build this X11 version > on? What other non-Linux platforms w/gcc 2.95 have you tried to build > this X11 version on? Do you have a problem if you download the official > GCC 2.95.2 release and build it the old GNU'fashion way? Does a purely > stock GCC 2.95 bomb on this?? If so, it is a GCC problem and the issue > should be raised with Cygnus. Yes it is a gcc-2.95.2 bug. It's fixed in the 2.96 snapshot in ports/lang/gcc-devel. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message