From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 19:42:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BF62BF for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 19:42:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smarthost.sentex.ca", Issuer "smarthost.sentex.ca" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3EE5EA3 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 19:42:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a] (saphire3.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t08Jgva1057302; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 14:42:57 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <54AEDD8B.1020306@sentex.net> Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 14:42:03 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa Organization: Sentex Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Benjamin Kaduk Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Upgraded clang, llvm and lldb to 3.5.0 References: <528C023D-6207-4054-917B-05D4C4E605EC@FreeBSD.org> <12132B80-E31B-4782-B69E-C9B8F6E6F0B8@netapp.com> <54AE72BF.5040405@hot.ee> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Cc: freebsd-current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 19:42:59 -0000 On 1/8/2015 1:21 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > I have no specific data about this specific case, but the advertised > procedure for upgrading between major branches is to update to the tip of > the starting branch before attempting the major version jump, i.e., update > to the tip of stable/9 before attempting to go to stable/10 or head. Actually, there seems to be a new caveat to this discussed in https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2015-January/081521.html ---Mike -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/