Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 12:10:49 -0800 From: Yuri <yuri@freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: math/R: Is LIBR really needed? Message-ID: <f9ea539e-a34b-71a2-907b-d897a056bdfa@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <86o9nzxv3w.fsf@phe.ftfl.ca> References: <411afdb5-9733-24bc-8b96-c6e946be16ff@freebsd.org> <86o9nzxv3w.fsf@phe.ftfl.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/18/17 11:08, Joseph Mingrone wrote: > Some potential concerns: > > - This is not upstream's default. > - Upstream warns of possible performance penalties [1,2]. > - Users currently without the shared library will have to reinstall R > packages the next time they update math/R. One way to eliminate all three concerns is if upstream built both shared and static libraries by default. Yuri
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f9ea539e-a34b-71a2-907b-d897a056bdfa>