From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 12 21:51:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A43A16A4CE for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:51:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5238043D45 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:51:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id B4457530D; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:51:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id DF8C05308 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:51:11 +0100 (CET) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9F4F933C1B; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:51:11 +0100 (CET) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <163678746.20050212124602@wanadoo.fr> <1198432873.20050212130307@wanadoo.fr> <86is4xvhdk.fsf@xps.des.no> <1965285046.20050212214343@wanadoo.fr> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:51:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1965285046.20050212214343@wanadoo.fr> (Anthony Atkielski's message of "Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:43:43 +0100") Message-ID: <868y5tv44w.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,FORGED_RCVD_HELO, PLING_PLING autolearn=disabled version=3.0.1 Subject: Re: Why in the world you should have a vote: was RE: Please don'tchange Beastie to another crap logo suchas NetBSD!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:51:44 -0000 Anthony Atkielski writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav writes: > > No. Existing copies would still be distributable and derivable under > > the original license terms. > What constitutes an "existing copy" in a world of downloads? I think you know the answer to that question perfectly well. I'm done wasting my time on you. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no