From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Jan 7 20:24:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rdc3.on.home.com (ha1.rdc3.on.home.com [24.2.9.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7DDF15237 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2000 20:24:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cwass99@home.com) Received: from tristan.net ([24.114.108.234]) by mail.rdc3.on.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.02 201-229-111-106) with ESMTP id <20000108042234.PPFS7552.mail.rdc3.on.home.com@tristan.net>; Fri, 7 Jan 2000 20:22:34 -0800 Content-Length: 703 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.2 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2000 23:21:31 -0500 (EST) From: Colin To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sppp behaviour Cc: Mark Newton , Cc: Mark Newton , Christoph Kukulies Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > This is only true if the connection was gone long enough for your lease > from the DHCP server to expire or the DHCP server is configured to not > re-issue > an address requested by a dynamically served host on reconnect. It occurs to me that I'm assuming a reboot/renew type request when the connection is re-established. I would think this might not be completely accurate ;) Thinking about it I would suspect a complete DHCP-discovery-request-etc would be a better choice here, but I haven't looked at the code. ---------------------------------- E-Mail: Colin Date: 07-Jan-2000 Time: 23:14:38 This message was sent by XFMail ---------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message