From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 10 14:13:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8270837B404 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 14:13:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.rdstm.ro (mail.rdstm.ro [193.231.233.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9BB43F3F for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 14:13:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from aanton@reversedhell.net) Received: from reversedhell.net (casa_auto [81.196.32.25]) by mail.rdstm.ro (8.12.9/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h6ALDmjd030568 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 00:13:48 +0300 Message-ID: <3F0BDDC9.9080102@reversedhell.net> Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 12:18:01 +0300 From: Alin-Adrian Anton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030606 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, ro MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: tcp raw socket programming recvfrom() X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 21:13:52 -0000 Hey folks, I wrote my piece of code to play with, and it uses raw sockets to send TCP packets. It sends packets okay, everything tested with a sniffer, everything is really really fine, but it seems I cannot recvfrom anything. I mean, it just keeps waiting and doesn't see the reply the server is actually sending (can be seen with a sniffer). I read that the freebsd kernel does not duplicate any incoming TCP/UDP packets to any of the opened raw sockets. Is that true? So the only solution is to use the interface in promiscuous mode and sniff like a sniffer for the expected packet? Is there any other way? PS: ICMP gets received well with recvfrom (tested). On Linux, it does work for tcp/udp too with recvfrom. I was also wondering if anyone could help me understand why this behaviour in freebsd? (or *BSD) Thanks! Best Regards, Alin.