From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 25 01:00:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12C1416A41F for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 01:00:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sergey.lungu@gmail.com) Received: from uproxy.gmail.com (uproxy.gmail.com [66.249.92.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D40C43D45 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 01:00:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sergey.lungu@gmail.com) Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o2so43683uge for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 17:00:34 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=C8YhTbVhKr+Jou7R8RV4MeQKsiwQp16C6ED4Ypno6YGkUcqy3gYBA1210r6amCoj+PLF6gZ/KeLPfabQGtt6eLQYRM5cjW2mqO3kuoEfN+vdVwugGueCb+leEuqRDiv1s3fUQIFrMzo8NSQwF9FmaGVLR5rZz1Ui+SZA0iOvsds= Received: by 10.66.241.16 with SMTP id o16mr46907ugh; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 17:00:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from ogre.obchaga.org ( [195.225.128.22]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id q1sm28832uge.2006.01.24.17.00.33; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 17:00:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 04:00:14 +0300 From: Sergey Lungu To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek Message-Id: <20060125040014.371eae38.sergey.lungu@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20060124234235.GC7617@garage.freebsd.pl> References: <20060122192257.273734cf.sergey.lungu@gmail.com> <20060124222747.GA7617@garage.freebsd.pl> <20060125014310.3f1ce1c9.sergey.lungu@gmail.com> <20060124234235.GC7617@garage.freebsd.pl> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.4 (GTK+ 2.8.10; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GEOM stripe + concat X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 01:00:37 -0000 On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 00:42:35 +0100 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 01:43:10AM +0300, Sergey Lungu wrote: > +> Perhaps this is dangerous and slow!? > > Give it a try. Certainly I will. > +> What about: > +> da0 - 120GB > +> da1 - 120GB > +> da2 - 300GB > +> da2a - 120GB > +> da2d - 120GB > +> da2e - 60GB > +> > +> concat(stripe(da0, da1, da2a, da2e), da2e) > > -----------------------------------------^ s/e/d/ Sorry, my mistake. > +> >From mathematical point of view this looks simplified :) > > Using two partitions of the same disk in stripe is very bad idea. This was just a joke :) -- Sergey Lungu The more complicated and grandiose the plan, the greater the chance of failure.