Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:05:00 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> To: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule Message-ID: <20120821190500.GA46595@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <CAGH67wS3jGTh-=b4X%2Bto9B67=_wpfHVqTNVYK-WZ-yVNz7gepQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <20120820194313.GC23607@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20120821132643.GE37262@felucia.tataz.chchile.org> <20120821134623.GH5044@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <5033D0C0.4030805@FreeBSD.org> <CAGH67wS3jGTh-=b4X%2Bto9B67=_wpfHVqTNVYK-WZ-yVNz7gepQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:47:36AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On 8/21/2012 6:46 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >> I would also like to just remove pkg_* tools from RELENG_10 if that fi= ts the > >> schedule. > > > > Um, no? >=20 > ... >=20 > > What _would_ be useful is what should have been done many years ago when > > it was first suggested: Move the pkg_* tools to ports. >=20 > It already exists -- it's just out of date / crufty: >=20 > $ make describe > pkg_install-20090902|/usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg_install|/usr/local|FreeBSD > -STABLE version of the package > tools|/usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg_install/pkg-descr|portmgr@FreeBSD.org|por= ts-mgmt||||||http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/ >=20 > > It's too late for 9.1 already, but if you made that change today in > > HEAD, and after 9.1 (but before 8.4) you MFC it to stable/[89], then you > > could theoretically make pkg mandatory after 9.1 EOLs. > > > > To make my point more clear, the ports tree has to support the last > > release to ship with pkg_* tools in the base throughout its lifetime. To > > do anything else would be be a massive POLA violation. >=20 > Agreed. > Thanks, > -Garrett Let's rephrase the plan: 1/ if it fits the schedule: get rid of pkg_* tools in current to be able to= have a fully pkgng only 10-RELEASE 2/ switch 9.2 (the ports tree) to pkgng (but keep pkg_* tools maybe drop th= em, but that is to be discussed to avoid POLA 3/ do the same for 8 once all of our supported release are fully pkgng aware and all the pkg_* release are EOLed, drop support for pkg_* tools from the ports tree. regards, Bapt --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlAz29wACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExrlgCgl2KExigBBlfHciEoOoWicaSq Lm0AnRqmvtDmD6JF8O2FHdmLApJY5afN =Ch5O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120821190500.GA46595>