Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 20:27:15 +0100 From: Thomas-Martin Seck <tmseck-lists@netcologne.de> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OPTIONS, LATEST_LINK, and RCng Message-ID: <20040224192715.GA717@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> In-Reply-To: <20040223203840.GE20557@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> References: <20040223120917.608.qmail@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> <4039F58C.1020004@fillmore-labs.com> <20040223132524.GA520@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> <20040223203840.GE20557@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Brooks Davis (brooks@one-eyed-alien.net): > On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 02:25:24PM +0100, Thomas-Martin Seck wrote: > > www/squid respects rcNG but does not enforce its use on non-rcNG > > systems. I do not know why this is such a problem for you. I would > > really like you to stop doing advocacy on this right now and instead ask > > you to respect what I have done. Thanks. > > This seems like a recipe for confused users. If you don't have rc.subr > installed and you get squid run a running, it will break if you install > a port that installs rc.subr. That's a major POLA violation in my book. I would not say "major" since I thought about it and thus documented it in squid.sh (which I expect people to read, maybe I am too optimistic here) but I will refrain from using $PREFIX/etc.subr to enable rcNG functionality in further versions of squid.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040224192715.GA717>