Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 09:40:02 -0800 (PST) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: bin/15906: rcmd(3) prototype disagrees with definition Message-ID: <200001051740.JAA13901@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR bin/15906; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: bin/15906: rcmd(3) prototype disagrees with definition Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 12:30:19 -0500 (EST) <<On Wed, 5 Jan 2000 15:01:35 +0100 (CET), Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de> said: >> Synopsis: rcmd(3) prototype disagrees with definition No, it does not. > int rcmd __P((char **, int, const char *, > const char *, const char *, int *)); This is the correct prototype for a declaration of the form: > int > rcmd(ahost, rport, locuser, remuser, cmd, fd2p) > char **ahost; > u_short rport; > const char *locuser, *remuser, *cmd; > int *fd2p; > Which instances should be fixed? Neither. Please read a text on Standard C, such as K&R or H&S. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200001051740.JAA13901>