From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun May 12 11:31:10 1996 Return-Path: owner-bugs Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA05724 for bugs-outgoing; Sun, 12 May 1996 11:31:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu (halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.159]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA05717 for ; Sun, 12 May 1996 11:31:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu; (5.65/1.1.8.2/19Aug95-0530PM) id AA09594; Sun, 12 May 1996 14:30:27 -0400 Date: Sun, 12 May 1996 14:30:27 -0400 From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <9605121830.AA09594@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> To: invalid opcode Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: List of open Problem Reports In-Reply-To: References: <9605121801.AA09298@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> Sender: owner-bugs@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk < said: > Yes, and I agree with you, but I feel people shoudln't send-pr things for > -current that were just recently broken by a known change, when it could > be solved by posting it to freebsd-current. Like if -current won't boot > for anyone. I don't feel you need to send-pr that, as everyone is going > to be seeing it, and I'm definetly sure it will come up in > freebsd-current. Well, I think I can speak for the FreeBSD Project (uh-oh!) when I say ``We Disagree''. We have had a terrible history in tracking bugs submitted through any means, and it's important for us to have a record of them. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | Shashish is simple, it's discreet, it's brief. ... wollman@lcs.mit.edu | Shashish is the bonding of hearts in spite of distance. Opinions not those of| It is a bond more powerful than absence. We like people MIT, LCS, ANA, or NSA| who like Shashish. - Claude McKenzie + Florent Vollant