From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Aug 1 23:24:01 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id XAA16035 for ports-outgoing; Tue, 1 Aug 1995 23:24:01 -0700 Received: from irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de [141.76.1.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with SMTP id XAA16015 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 1995 23:23:56 -0700 Received: from sax.sax.de by irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de with SMTP (5.67b+/DEC-Ultrix/4.3) id AA16965; Wed, 2 Aug 1995 08:11:51 +0200 Received: by sax.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id IAA03583; Wed, 2 Aug 1995 08:11:50 +0200 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.6.11/8.6.9) id HAA09603; Wed, 2 Aug 1995 07:49:44 +0200 From: J Wunsch Message-Id: <199508020549.HAA09603@uriah.heep.sax.de> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc inetd.conf To: ache@astral.msk.su (=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= aka) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 1995 07:49:43 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, asami@cs.berkeley.edu, ports@freebsd.org, rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com, roberto@blaise.ibp.fr, tom@uniserve.com In-Reply-To: from "=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= aka" at Aug 1, 95 07:29:52 pm Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 1094 Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk As =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= aka wrote: > > >> start uuxqt when don't want to wait until all files becomes received. > > >``run-uuxqt 2'' (or 3) is a better solution (IMHO). > > It isn't solution, I want to parse incoming stuff in the middle > of connection, not after it. Did you read the doc? That's exactly what this option does! (You can even set it to 1, this will call an uuxqt for each incoming job, as long as no other uuxqt is running [max-uuxqts 1 assumed].) > Rod, can you move it from gnu/libexec to gnu/sbin, please? > I'll fix all makefiles after repository move. I'm against it, and i cannot remember anybody else who has been voting *for* such a move. Reason why i'm against it: principle of least surprise. It's a rather gratuitous move, now that we've been shipping every FreeBSD so far with the UUCP stuff under /usr/libexec/uucp. I would perhaps vote otherwise if this were the initial import. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)