From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 21 15:18:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BE4B37B401 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 15:18:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dentrita.perpels.com (95.Red-217-126-9.pooles.rima-tde.net [217.126.9.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4122643FA3 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 15:18:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from drio@perpels.com) Received: from big.perpels.com (unknown [192.168.0.5]) by dentrita.perpels.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE69A141 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 00:18:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: by big.perpels.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C5A32531A; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 00:18:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 00:18:40 +0200 From: David Rio To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030721221840.GB58118@perpels.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: RELENG_5 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 22:18:47 -0000 Hi all: I have been using FreeBSD in production enviroments so I used FreeBSD 4.7 and 4.8. Now, I have installed FreeBSD 5.1 on my laptop. So I decided to keep track of the -RELEASE_5 (STABLE). But It seems that there is not such a branch on the repository. Reading diferent links at freebsd.org. It seems that there is only to branchs for 5.1: -CURRENT -RELENG_5_1 The first one, I think can be a very agresive for my intentions. The second one, instead, will not modify my sources to improve the performace because it is a patch branch. If I am not wrong with this, what will be the reason to install 5.1 instead 4.8? I mean, 5.1 has more features but a worst performace that 4.8. On the other hand, there is no -STABLE branch of 5.1 so the only way to keep you system up to date is follow the -CURRENT branch which is a little agresive in my case. Thanks in advance.