From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Apr 5 15:19:54 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA28969 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Sun, 5 Apr 1998 15:19:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [204.244.213.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id PAA28926 for ; Sun, 5 Apr 1998 15:19:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tom@sdf.com) Received: from tom by misery.sdf.com with smtp (Exim 1.82 #3) id 0yLxMW-0006Bc-00; Sun, 5 Apr 1998 14:54:00 -0700 Date: Sun, 5 Apr 1998 14:53:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom To: Terry Lambert cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it, frank@our.domaintje.com, tcobb@staff.circle.net, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Softupdate for 2.2.6? In-Reply-To: <199804052201.PAA27114@usr05.primenet.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 5 Apr 1998, Terry Lambert wrote: > If patches were provided, say for soft updates, would they be > integrated, or would thy have to remain "third party"? Would said patches work? Softupdates in current does not work. Someone would have to pull quite the rabbit out of their hat to get softupdates to work in 2.2.x before current. > Terry Lambert > terry@lambert.org > --- > Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present > or previous employers. Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message