From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan  4 12:14:04 2012
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
	id EC45D1065670; Wed,  4 Jan 2012 12:14:04 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 12:14:04 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Johan van Selst <johans@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20120104121404.GA14154@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201201021214.q02CErbi098315@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<4F024051.1030907@FreeBSD.org>
	<20120104092337.GA78009@mud.stack.nl>
	<20120104111254.GC3811@FreeBSD.org>
	<20120104114516.GA82270@mud.stack.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120104114516.GA82270@mud.stack.nl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/editors Makefile ports/editors/ged Makefile
	distinfo pkg-descr
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 12:14:05 -0000

On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:45:16PM +0100, Johan van Selst wrote:
> Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 10:23:38AM +0100, Johan van Selst wrote:
> > > Actually, I don't really see the benefit of this port. But there was
> > > a request for it and it seemed like little effort to maintain it ;)
> > Per quoted above, it should not be added.  Contrary to GNU versions of sed
> > and awk, if base ed(1) can be used as drop-in replacement, over-populating
> > ports collection just because someone wanted to remain their work in the
> > history does not warrant it.  I believe the best would be to follow up with
> > maintainer and either 1) find out and explain in pkg-descr what this port
> > can do that base ed(1) cannot; or 2) cvs rm it.
> 
> It is not a question of a maintainer wanting their name in the tree.
> I'm the maintainer of this port now - and my name is in enough locations
> as it is.

Ah, sorry, I somehow got under impression that someone submitted the shar to
you for commit.

> I'll try and find out what the added value of this version is, and will
> remove it again if there isn't any.

Thanks.

./danfe