From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 10 05:50:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45E02106568B; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:50:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itetcu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from worf.ds9.tecnik93.com (worf.ds9.tecnik93.com [81.196.207.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C538FC14; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:50:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (it.buh.tecnik93.com [81.196.204.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by worf.ds9.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DE3FF22C5090; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:50:09 +0200 (EET) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:50:08 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Bruce Simpson Message-ID: <20100210075008.1d1fd87d@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <4B707F9D.80807@incunabulum.net> References: <201002081940.o18JeO6t065676@repoman.freebsd.org> <20100208230225.57518342@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <4B707F9D.80807@incunabulum.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.4 (GTK+ 2.18.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/598bFNmIuK2OYuo3EAyiR.e"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: Bruce M Simpson , cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, QAT@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/print Makefile ports/print/openprinting Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-message ports/print/openprinting/files patch-freebsd X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:50:11 -0000 --Sig_/598bFNmIuK2OYuo3EAyiR.e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:18:21 +0000 Bruce Simpson wrote: > Not MAKE_JOBS_SAFE ? >=20 > I haven't seen this on either box I built it on (8.0-STABLE/amd64,=20 > 8.0-RELEASE/i386). >=20 > Is the ccache support in the ports tiny invasive in any way? This=20 > package is mostly Sun code and it does use its own link maps as you > can see. My current view about ccache is that it works perfectly in 99.9% cases and fails in strange way in the rest. It might be ... I'll try it without when I'll have QAT idleing (which won't happen very soon). --=20 IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B --Sig_/598bFNmIuK2OYuo3EAyiR.e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAktySREACgkQJ7GIuiH/oeUnSACgh+0Du6AIjfbyVZZufCcklwss bNwAn1wnZaP/d34arPGpdWollaV4utiD =BtSg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/598bFNmIuK2OYuo3EAyiR.e--