From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Feb 22 23:13:16 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5058B14FDDFB for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 23:13:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from viclamta32p.bpe.bigpond.com (viclamta32p.bpe.bigpond.com [203.38.21.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "", Issuer "Openwave Messaging Inc." (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D77FA8C77A for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 23:13:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from smtp.telstra.com ([10.10.26.4]) by viclafep01p-svc.bpe.nexus.telstra.com.au with ESMTP id <20190222221904.UJHJ27957.viclafep01p-svc.bpe.nexus.telstra.com.au@smtp.telstra.com> for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 09:19:04 +1100 X-RG-Spam: Unknown X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedutddruddtgdduieduucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuuffpveftpgfvgffnuffvtfetnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvufgjkfhffgggtgesmhdttdertderjeenucfhrhhomhepffgrvhgvucfjohhrshhfrghllhcuoegurghvvgeshhhorhhsfhgrlhhlrdhorhhgqeenucfkphepuddutddrudeguddrudelfedrvdeffeenucfrrghrrghmpehhvghloheprghnvghurhhinhdrhhhorhhsfhgrlhhlrdhorhhgpdhinhgvthepuddutddrudeguddrudelfedrvdeffedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeeouggrvhgvsehhohhrshhfrghllhdrohhrghequceuqfffjgepkeeukffvoffkoffgpdhrtghpthhtohepoehfrhgvvggsshguqdhpohhrthhssehfrhgvvggsshgurdhorhhgqeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-RG-VS-CLASS: clean Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (110.141.193.233) by smtp.telstra.com (9.0.019.26-1) id 5C53EF9003AD8311 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 09:19:03 +1100 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1MMJ2bs091504 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 09:19:02 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id x1MMJ123091501 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 09:19:02 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) X-Authentication-Warning: aneurin.horsfall.org: dave owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 09:19:01 +1100 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1 In-Reply-To: <20190222140407.2145c11e@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> Message-ID: References: <416689e6-37f9-17ec-54d8-0d224c26f30f@pinyon.org> <20190217151604.GB68620@night.db.net> <20190221180515.39c79ce6@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <092b17f0-6fbf-662e-1061-403442248abd@pinyon.org> <20190222140407.2145c11e@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (BSF 287 2018-06-16) X-GPG-Public-Key: http://www.horsfall.org/gpgkey.pub X-GPG-Fingerprint: 05B4 FFBC 0218 B438 66E0 587B EF46 7357 EF5E F58B X-Home-Page: http://www.horsfall.org/ X-Witty-Saying: "chmod 666 the_mode_of_the_beast" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-ID: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D77FA8C77A X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=neutral (mx1.freebsd.org: 203.38.21.96 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of dave@horsfall.org) smtp.mailfrom=dave@horsfall.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.36 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.25)[-0.248,0]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; MX_INVALID(0.50)[greylisted]; R_SPF_NEUTRAL(0.00)[?all]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.27)[-0.267,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/mixed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[horsfall.org]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.42)[-0.423,0]; CTYPE_MIXED_BOGUS(1.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.01)[country: AU(-0.04)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:1221, ipnet:203.36.0.0/14, country:AU]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[96.21.38.203.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1] Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=UTF-8; FORMAT=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 23:13:16 -0000 On Fri, 22 Feb 2019, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > If I were the lang/gcc maintainer this -rpath problem would be my number > one priority. The current maintainer has never proposed any solutions > and when I submit patches he always resists. I'm done wasting my time > fighting him. I'm late to this discussion (not being a Fortran/Python user) but is there any way to remove a recalcitrant maintainer? -- Dave From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Feb 23 00:06:25 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6092314FF733 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 00:06:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "troutmask", Issuer "troutmask" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F1088E46C for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 00:06:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x1N06KpY012964 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:06:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1N06K8X012963; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:06:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:06:20 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Dave Horsfall Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: FreeCAD 0.17 && /lib//libgcc_s.so.1 Message-ID: <20190223000620.GA12700@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu References: <416689e6-37f9-17ec-54d8-0d224c26f30f@pinyon.org> <20190217151604.GB68620@night.db.net> <20190221180515.39c79ce6@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <092b17f0-6fbf-662e-1061-403442248abd@pinyon.org> <20190222140407.2145c11e@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.2 (2019-01-07) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8F1088E46C X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.60 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.56)[0.561,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.74)[-0.744,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[washington.edu]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[21.76.95.128.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.11.2]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[troutmask.apl.washington.edu]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.03)[0.030,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:73, ipnet:128.95.0.0/16, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.06)[ip: (0.12), ipnet: 128.95.0.0/16(0.18), asn: 73(0.09), country: US(-0.07)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 00:06:25 -0000 On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 09:19:01AM +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote: > On Fri, 22 Feb 2019, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > > > If I were the lang/gcc maintainer this -rpath problem would be my number > > one priority. The current maintainer has never proposed any solutions > > and when I submit patches he always resists. I'm done wasting my time > > fighting him. > > I'm late to this discussion (not being a Fortran/Python user) but is there > any way to remove a recalcitrant maintainer? > Dave, Can you explain what you mean? The maintainer of the lang/gcc ports is a long-time member of the GCC steering committee and a long-time maintainer of all gcc FreeBSD ports. There are very few FreeBSD users (like 3 of us) who have commit access to the gcc tree. Seems like a dubious idea to remove one of those 3. -- Steve