From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Oct  3 12:31:46 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA17250
          for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Sat, 3 Oct 1998 12:31:46 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from gershwin.tera.com ([207.224.230.28])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA17235
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 3 Oct 1998 12:31:44 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org)
Received: from tao.thought.org (tao.tera.com [207.108.223.55])
	by gershwin.tera.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA03968
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 3 Oct 1998 12:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.8.8/8.7.3) id MAA11968; Sat, 3 Oct 1998 12:31:10 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <19981003123110.49111@thought.org>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 1998 12:31:10 -0700
From: Gary Kline <kline@thought.org>
To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Xlib only (not Xt) X-ware?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


  Anybody know of any X-ware ports other than rxvt and xcoral
  that do _not_ use the Xt intrinsics, but only Xlib?

  I gave up on my Xlib-only version of an application that I
  began in 1996 because my app grew too complex.  The Xt route
  is simpler in some respects and a whole 'nother ballgame in
  others.  If there are any other (significant) efforts done
  in Xlib-only I'd like to know.

  thanks,

  gary

-- 
   Gary D. Kline         kline@tao.thought.org          Public service uNix


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message