Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:35:36 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn <garyj@peedub.muc.de> To: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Cc: "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" <knu@idaemons.org>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: versioning system (Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/ElectricFence ...) Message-ID: <200003220935.KAA09544@peedub.muc.de> In-Reply-To: Your message of "21 Mar 2000 14:42:47 PST." <vqck8iwueqg.fsf_-_@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami writes: >I've also thought about adding a mandatory VERSION variable separate >from DISTNAME/PKGNAME, to have something like > >PORTNAME= foo >VERSION= 1.2 > >These two variables will be mandatory, and DISTNAME and PKGNAME will >be defined in bsd.port.mk as ${PORTNAME}-${VERSION}. (The PKGNAME >will not be overridable; it will be an error for a port to define it.) > >At least this will help ensure that the ${PKGNAME} will have correct >formats (well, you can always put a "-" in VERSION, but that's far >easier to find than going through a list of packages/All or >packages/Latest). >=== > >If nobody has any objections, I will go sweep through the tree and >make these changes. > Wait a minute. What about ports like editors/xemacs21 which are used as the front-end to other ports ? The Makefile defines PKGNAME as ${LANGPREFIX}xemacs${PKGNAMEEXT}-21.1.9 there. Not being able to override PKGNAME will break this (and probably other) port(s). --- Gary Jennejohn / garyj@muc.de garyj@fkr.cpqcorp.net gj@freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200003220935.KAA09544>