From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Feb 23 19: 0:53 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from iguana.aciri.org (iguana.aciri.org [192.150.187.36]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDA137B401 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 19:00:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo@iguana.aciri.org) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by iguana.aciri.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f1O30oA07888; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 19:00:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo) From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <200102240300.f1O30oA07888@iguana.aciri.org> Subject: Re: dummynet as modules In-Reply-To: <3A9722A5.D305A67@ffnet.com> from Michael Solan at "Feb 23, 2001 6:55:34 pm" To: solan@ffnet.com (Michael Solan) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 19:00:50 -0800 (PST) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > How do I compile a a kernel without ipfw, and a ipfw.ko module with > dummynet support? not sure how well is this supported -- i guess you should look at the makefile for the ipfw module to make sure it includes dummynet. But: > I have to add some features to the dummynet code, so instead of > rebooting every 5 mins I figured kldloading it would save me some time. yes it can be convenient, but if you are testing, chances are that you will be making mistakes which can result in crashes or leaks etc, so a separate test box (or a vmware system) will be convenient anyways... cheers luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message