From owner-freebsd-security Mon Oct 14 22:16:53 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0F437B401 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 22:16:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mgr2.xmission.com (mgr2.xmission.com [198.60.22.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E0C43E9C for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 22:16:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: from mail by mgr2.xmission.com with spam-scanned (Exim 3.35 #1) id 181K4V-0003xK-02 for security@freebsd.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 23:16:47 -0600 Received: from [207.135.128.145] (helo=misty.eyesbeyond.com) by mgr2.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 181K49-0003mR-02; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 23:16:26 -0600 Received: (from glewis@localhost) by misty.eyesbeyond.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g9F5GMK98349; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 14:46:22 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) X-Authentication-Warning: misty.eyesbeyond.com: glewis set sender to glewis@eyesbeyond.com using -f Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 14:46:21 +0930 From: Greg Lewis To: Brett Glass Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: TCFS for FreeBSD? Message-ID: <20021015144621.A98316@misty.eyesbeyond.com> References: <200210140627.AAA13616@lariat.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200210140627.AAA13616@lariat.org>; from brett@lariat.org on Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 12:27:45AM -0600 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=8.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT,X_AUTH_WARNING version=2.42 X-Spam-Level: Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 12:27:45AM -0600, Brett Glass wrote: > Has TCFS been ported to FreeBSD? I'm looking for a good encrypted network > file system for a group of FreeBSD machines. > > --Brett Glass I've got a partial port against -STABLE, but obviously as I'm using the word partial its not complete :). The kernel portion is mostly done, except that its not linking (something to do with how I use MALLOC_DECLARE judging by the linker errors). I haven't started the userland portions, but should the kernel side actually work by some minor miracle once the linker problem was resolved then that shouldn't be too much of a problem. -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message