Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 16:46:28 -0400 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, mike.patterson@unb.ca Subject: Re: deskutils/logjam, deskutils/logjam2 Message-ID: <20040513204628.GC15500@toxic.magnesium.net> In-Reply-To: <20040513013706.GB69406@isis.wad.cz> References: <20040513013706.GB69406@isis.wad.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> (05.12.2004 @ 2137 PST): Roman Neuhauser said, in 0.6K: << > logjam is logjam-3.0.4, logjam2 is logjam-4.4.0, the former has > obviously been withdrawn from the distribution site. shouldn't > the deskutils/logjam2 port be moved into deskutils/logjam? the name > certainly doesn't make any sense. >> end of "deskutils/logjam, deskutils/logjam2" from Roman Neuhauser << I see no reason to retain logjam(v1). I have been meaning to do this for a while. Thanks for the reminder; if nobody else has so far, I will file a PR about this. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@magnesium.net || adamw@FreeBSD.org adamw@vectors.cx || adamw@gnome.org http://www.vectors.cx
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040513204628.GC15500>