Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Nov 2019 22:14:58 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        net@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 235607] Incorrect checksums with NAT on vtnet with offloading
Message-ID:  <bug-235607-7501-DgpD6RU1gH@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-235607-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-235607-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235607

--- Comment #11 from Jorge Schrauwen <sjorge+signup@blackdot.be> ---
(In reply to Vincenzo Maffione from comment #9)
I am using bhyve, but on an illumos host system. On illumos bhyve does supp=
ort
this offloading.

I was talking about this with Tom Jones at FOSDEM and again at EuroBSDcon 2=
019,
the main problem is indeed that FreeBSD's bhyve did not support all the
offloading which made producing a test case that worked on FreeBSD+Bhyve ra=
ther
problematic.

I only run a mix of FreeBSD and illumos (SmartOS) so I am not sure the beha=
vior
on Linux/KVM matches that of illumos/bhyve. I do know that freebsd/bhyve did
not have the problem due as you said, lack of all the offloading features.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-235607-7501-DgpD6RU1gH>