Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 03:09:18 +0530 From: ashish@freebsd.org (Ashish SHUKLA) To: Joseph Mingrone <jrm@ftfl.ca> Cc: Ashish SHUKLA <ashish@freebsd.org>, ports-list freebsd <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [CFT] editors/emacs to 24.1 Message-ID: <86boiumgvt.fsf@chateau.d.if> In-Reply-To: <CANRUcdD3ERA-3__fo5NpASR9Xj-1VQZGcyGnJvBV1WuTZ5Tf_A@mail.gmail.com> (Joseph Mingrone's message of "Wed, 1 Aug 2012 18:21:38 -0300") References: <86vchenbsx.fsf@chateau.d.if> <500D3652.2000603@janh.de> <CANRUcdB0D4nG8OWpopGUMMebrX%2Bba4QpMaKRJJ4DJ3AV0tLphQ@mail.gmail.com> <de5270941156b9437068558e50d83248@eumx.net> <CANRUcdDYNnTRm0kHdSNY5YNnu0ymJUJ5FEEmZ=Lco=E=yOYfkg@mail.gmail.com> <86lii19h10.fsf@chateau.d.if> <CANRUcdBZdmY8=tROxNORChP5x=jygs%2BpdF%2BsWrp_7jSqAsj15A@mail.gmail.com> <86a9yh9fii.fsf@chateau.d.if> <CANRUcdANrQNxX2m1n7Ckzc5arZbDwZq6Bn5Rfr7xUhzN2Qv=FA@mail.gmail.com> <CANRUcdCoucNZ6fGsHvcALbwD8NfgKyXUTTMxednOQqY%2BQ744Ow@mail.gmail.com> <86txwo99sl.fsf@chateau.d.if> <CANRUcdDWyCWFwU6Y_O5jTmzvbH-%2BOUtp=xaLyntc8kpavaVhUw@mail.gmail.com> <CANRUcdD3ERA-3__fo5NpASR9Xj-1VQZGcyGnJvBV1WuTZ5Tf_A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Joseph, On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 18:21:38 -0300, Joseph Mingrone <jrm@ftfl.ca> said: > Hello again Ashish; > I played around with the port options and it does indeed look like > dbus/gconf/gtk were being installed because they were "indirect > dependencies". For example, with these options selected (shown > below) the run dependencies were limited to > % make run-depends-list > /usr/ports/devel/pkgconf > /usr/ports/graphics/jpeg > /usr/ports/graphics/png > /usr/ports/graphics/tiff > /usr/ports/print/freetype2 > /usr/ports/print/libotf > /usr/ports/security/gnutls > /usr/ports/textproc/libxml2 > /usr/ports/x11-fonts/libXft > /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/libXaw > /usr/ports/x11/libXpm. Weird. Do you've any idea from where devel/libgsf was getting included in dependencies list? > The list no longer contains devel/libgsf, which pulls in > dbus/gconf/gtk. I was confused when I turned off options like dbus > and saw that it was still getting installed. > Thanks for enduring all my emails and thanks for the hard work > involved with updating the port. No problems. Ports are updated now. Let me know if you see any issues. Thanks -- Ashish SHUKLA | GPG: F682 CDCC 39DC 0FEA E116 20B6 C746 CFA9 E74F A4B0 Sent from my Emacs
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86boiumgvt.fsf>