Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Dec 2017 06:44:20 -0800
From:      "Chris H" <portmaster@BSDforge.com>
To:        "Guido Falsi" <mad@madpilot.net>
Cc:        "FreeBSD Ports" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, "Dave Horsfall" <dave@horsfall.org>
Subject:   Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check
Message-ID:  <f87f8e42bb8f1d07d8b19456e2d232e3@udns.ultimatedns.net>
In-Reply-To: <4bd4e1d3-6471-a66f-ba4e-9d475258960b@madpilot.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 08:59:04 +0100 "Guido Falsi" <mad@madpilot=2Enet> said

> On 12/09/2017 01:34, Chris H wrote:
> > On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 10:16:54 +1100 (EST) "Dave Horsfall"
> > <dave@horsfall=2Eorg> said
> >=20
> >> On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >>
> >> > First, there is movement afoot to remove sendmail from FreeBSD and >
> >> replace it with dma(1)=2E
> >>
> >> There is?=C2=A0 Is there anything else that they're going to spring on=
 us?
> >>
> >> (I'm still annoyed that they removed "jive" because it upset someone's
> >> delicate sensibilities=2E)
> > Hmm=2E This does not come as good news to me=2E I've been working on an
> > antispam
> > system that targets the use of Sendmail, for about a year (not counting=
 the
> > untold hours spent tuning it over the years)=2E Sure, many aren't comfort=
able
> > with the m4(1) macros=2E But c'mon=2E Please don't=2E
> > As to these backstage removal discussions; is it remotely possible that
> > those of whom continue to use, and contribute to *BSD after all these y=
ears
> > might be included in these discussions?
>=20
> I just chime in to point out that the discussion is not happening in any
> backstage=2E
>=20
> The proposal was sent to the arch mailing list, which is public=2E I'm not
> subscribed to it either but I was pointed there by a fellow user=2E
>=20
> https://lists=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2017-December/018712=2Ehtm=
l
Indeed, and thank you, Guido=2E
I'm not subscribed either, and find myself puzzled as to that choice of lis=
ts
to make the announcement=2E But then again, what do I know=2E I still want to k=
eep
it in base=2E :-)

--Chris
>=20
> --=20
> Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot=2Enet>





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f87f8e42bb8f1d07d8b19456e2d232e3>