From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Nov  6 06:05:53 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id GAA20596
          for questions-outgoing; Wed, 6 Nov 1996 06:05:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from horton.iaces.com ([204.147.87.98])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA20591
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 1996 06:05:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from proot@localhost) by horton.iaces.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA04948; Wed, 6 Nov 1996 08:05:21 -0600 (CST)
From: "Paul T. Root" <proot@horton.iaces.com>
Message-Id: <199611061405.IAA04948@horton.iaces.com>
Subject: Re: SunOS and Solaris?
To: sln@public.jn.sd.cn
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 1996 08:05:21 -0600 (CST)
Cc: questions@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <32803AD4.58F2@public.jn.sd.cn> from Song Lining at "Nov 6, 96 03:14:28 pm"
X-Organization: !nterprise Networking Services - ACES
X-Phone: (612) 663-1979
X-Fax: (612) 663-8030
X-Page: (800) SKY-PAGE PIN: 537-7270
X-Address: 200 S. 5th St., Suite 1100
X-Address: Minneapolis, MN 55402
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In a previous message, Song Lining said:
> Hi,
> 
> I know it's not a proper place to post this question but anybody's
> answer would be highly appreciated. My question is: What's the
> difference between Sun's SunOS and Solaris. I can't find out any
> difference by myself.

There are 2 answers to that:

1) Solaris = SunOS + Openwindows + Desktop tools (Calendar Manager etc).

	So SunOS 4.1.3 plus Openwindows 2  is Solaris 1.1.1
	And SunOS 5.5 plus Openwin 3.5 is Solaris 2.5

2) SunOS is the common name for the previous operating system. Ie. SunOS
4.1.3, which is based on BSD 4.2 with some 4.3 extensions.

Solaris on the other hand, is SVR4 based, starting at Solaris 2.0 up
to Solaris 2.5.1. Conventional wisdom is 2.0 to 2.2 is unstable and
vertually unusable, 2.3 is fair, 2.4 is much faster and 2.5 is pretty
stable and fast.

Why are there 2 answers? Marketing. When Sun switched to SVR4 and came
out with Solaris, they wanted to say that Solaris had more apps written
to it than any other commersial Unix. To be able to say that, they retro-
actively re-named SunOS 4.1.3 to Solaris 1.1.1


Generally, I have found in the user community, when a person says SunOS,
they mean 4.1.x (or rarely now 3.5). It they say Solaris, they mean 2.x


Paul.

-- 
Paul T. Root                    E/Mail: proot@iaces.com
200 S. 5th St. Suite 1100       PAG: +1 (800) SKY-PAGE PIN: 537-7370
Minneapolis, MN  55402          WRK: +1 (612) 663-1979
NIC:    PTR                     FAX: +1 (612) 663-8030