From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Jun  1 15:09:58 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA07505
          for current-outgoing; Sun, 1 Jun 1997 15:09:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA07495
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 1 Jun 1997 15:09:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1])
	by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA21171;
	Sun, 1 Jun 1997 15:09:57 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199706012209.PAA21171@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96
To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch)
cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: C++ or Java interface ala ORB for snmp?
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 01 Jun 1997 22:31:18 +0200."
             <19970601223118.VX29490@uriah.heep.sax.de> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 1997 15:09:57 -0700
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Thank you. Adding ul to the large constants silenced the warnings
and if the  ucd-snmp patch is modified to reflect this last change then
are pretty much done with the port.

Now a different topic, given that we have ported communication platforms
such as OmniORB, OmniBroker, ILU, and ACE . It will be good to develop 
a generic set of interfaces for the purpose of deploying
network management apps. If we can interface snmp to JAVA using 
CORBA it will be fantastic: portable network management apps.
Additionally, if use CORBA we should be able to come up with interesting
network managements apps that don't necessarily use snmp rather 
programmable agent/application.

	Enjoy,
	Amancio