From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Feb 2 16:34:53 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA08226 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Tue, 2 Feb 1999 16:34:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA08221 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 1999 16:34:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.2/8.9.1) id BAA54424; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 01:34:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des) To: "Matthew D. Fuller" Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , "Jason C. Wells" , W Gerald Hicks , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Lets Endorse KDE Was: some slashdot thread References: <19990202182557.O16540@futuresouth.com> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 03 Feb 1999 01:34:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: "Matthew D. Fuller"'s message of "Tue, 2 Feb 1999 18:25:57 -0600" Message-ID: Lines: 21 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org "Matthew D. Fuller" writes: > Just to toss my personal red cents in... (hey, doesn't everbody?) > > I'm a twm person. I'm playing with ctwm now to see what I can do with > it. I love it. It's lightweight, has basically every feature I want and > a lot I don't. > > On the flip side, it DOES take a bit of work to set it up the way you > want, and the defaults suck like an intern. If we had to make a new > 'default X wm/etc', my vote would have to be for fvwm. [...] Actually, fvwm2 is less memory-hungry than twm, and has a lot more features. Don't even consider fvwm; it has no advantage over fvwm2, and its configuration syntax is very messy. Check out the fvwm2 configuration (and accompanying snapshot) I mentioned in a previous message. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message