Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:27:33 +0000 From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> To: "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Michael Scheidell <scheidell@freebsd.org>, Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Installing executables with generic names Message-ID: <CADLo839jaOOzW3X4UK1eYSWU_akX9SoKi%2Bj9JWYVKi8KTN546Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4F3AAD8D.2040609@aldan.algebra.com> References: <4F3A60FE.7050009@aldan.algebra.com> <4F3A7CDF.8000405@freebsd.org> <4F3A895D.9040609@aldan.algebra.com> <4F3A907C.5060305@freebsd.org> <20120214201721.11e74bbb@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <4F3AAD8D.2040609@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14 Feb 2012 18:54, "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com> wrote: > > On 14.02.2012 13:17, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: >> >> The other idea of prefixing them is_much_ better. > > > Ok, so which flavor of prefixing do you prefer? Should the executable "bar" be installed as bin/foo-bar or as bin/foo/bar? bin/foo-bar means it can still be called without an explicit path, so that is better. Look for autoconf hooks to add prefices this way (if it uses configure...) Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo839jaOOzW3X4UK1eYSWU_akX9SoKi%2Bj9JWYVKi8KTN546Q>