Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:27:33 +0000
From:      Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
To:        "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org, Michael Scheidell <scheidell@freebsd.org>, Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Installing executables with generic names
Message-ID:  <CADLo839jaOOzW3X4UK1eYSWU_akX9SoKi%2Bj9JWYVKi8KTN546Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F3AAD8D.2040609@aldan.algebra.com>
References:  <4F3A60FE.7050009@aldan.algebra.com> <4F3A7CDF.8000405@freebsd.org> <4F3A895D.9040609@aldan.algebra.com> <4F3A907C.5060305@freebsd.org> <20120214201721.11e74bbb@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <4F3AAD8D.2040609@aldan.algebra.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14 Feb 2012 18:54, "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com> wrote:
>
> On 14.02.2012 13:17, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
>>
>> The other idea of prefixing them is_much_  better.
>
>
> Ok, so which flavor of prefixing do you prefer? Should the executable
"bar" be installed as bin/foo-bar or as bin/foo/bar?

bin/foo-bar means it can still be called without an explicit path, so that
is better.

Look for autoconf hooks to add prefices this way (if it uses configure...)

Chris



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo839jaOOzW3X4UK1eYSWU_akX9SoKi%2Bj9JWYVKi8KTN546Q>