From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 19:27:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF36106566B; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:27:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D928FC0A; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:27:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhfs35 with SMTP id s35so296606yhf.13 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:27:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=uMObq1/EjInMCQDC0YV2ZK4qJmJIYJAd2hHDJRWwLes=; b=GUlfSZQXisamjvfRDdEKaSxz5STJEkTs7Bb1YWx54b8glPSsroGwpQ/sa7UT8517+I B1HNW78WfoRe55ifhtLtNrw/PjoKQlqKe0c/FtX14hozV/sbG9hCUACCQT0UwUKZUOQ5 kLUOWRR2gBWhWZruNCiF6Y/2ehTUtP/8/aZr4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.156.166 with SMTP id wf6mr6659672igb.20.1329247653977; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:27:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.183.21 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:27:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.183.21 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:27:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F3AAD8D.2040609@aldan.algebra.com> References: <4F3A60FE.7050009@aldan.algebra.com> <4F3A7CDF.8000405@freebsd.org> <4F3A895D.9040609@aldan.algebra.com> <4F3A907C.5060305@freebsd.org> <20120214201721.11e74bbb@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <4F3AAD8D.2040609@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:27:33 +0000 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: "Mikhail T." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Michael Scheidell , Ion-Mihai Tetcu Subject: Re: Installing executables with generic names X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:27:35 -0000 On 14 Feb 2012 18:54, "Mikhail T." wrote: > > On 14.02.2012 13:17, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: >> >> The other idea of prefixing them is_much_ better. > > > Ok, so which flavor of prefixing do you prefer? Should the executable "bar" be installed as bin/foo-bar or as bin/foo/bar? bin/foo-bar means it can still be called without an explicit path, so that is better. Look for autoconf hooks to add prefices this way (if it uses configure...) Chris