Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 05:07:12 +1000 From: "DocuSign" <docusign3ffusdo-noreply-fx6aceqq-fx8accqq-fx6acb2qq@online.de> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Sign documents electronically in just minutes:freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <721B54CE72A234D51F16BE6F1F81AD643F28E52A@DESKTOP-R4KTRH6>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
DocuSign Your document has been completed REVIEW DOCUMENT Attention: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Please review the document for electronic signature. Thank You. Do Not Share This Email This email contains a secure link to DocuSign. Please do not share this ema= il, link, or access code with others. About DocuSign Sign documents electronically in just minutes. It's safe, secure, and legal= ly binding. Whether you're in an office, at home, on-the-go -- or even acro= ss the globe -- DocuSign provides a professional trusted solution for Digit= al Transaction Management?. Questions about the Document? If you need to modify the document or have questions about the details in t= he document, please reach out to the sender by emailing them directly. If you are having trouble signing the document, please visit the Help with = Signing page on our Support Center This message was sent to you by James Matt who is using the DocuSign Electr= onic Signature Service. If you would rather not receive email from this sen= der you may contact the sender with your request. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jan 30 21:05:29 2019 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0451319C20 for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 21:05:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54AB886423 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 21:05:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 14CA61319C1F; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 21:05:29 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41EB1319C1E for <questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 21:05:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from echo.brtsvcs.net (echo.brtsvcs.net [IPv6:2607:f740:c::4ae]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C84886421 for <questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 21:05:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (catnip [73.240.250.185]) by echo.brtsvcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CE4B38D2B; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 13:05:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.26.25.66] (leon.pilgrimaccounting.com [10.26.25.66]) by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A5FC91E2; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 13:05:21 -0800 (PST) To: questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-zfs@freebsd.org From: Mel Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com> Subject: Why is zpool_cache_load="YES" not the default? Message-ID: <a32720d9-3ba6-a921-fbac-c0d0e3faf973@bluerosetech.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 13:05:22 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 9C84886421 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com designates 2607:f740:c::4ae as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.70 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[echo.brtsvcs.net,foxtrot.brtsvcs.net]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.985,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:2607:f740:c::/48, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[185.250.240.73.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.10]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bluerosetech.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-3.40)[ip: (-8.64), ipnet: 2607:f740:c::/48(-4.41), asn: 36236(-3.91), country: US(-0.07)]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/> List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 21:05:30 -0000 In migrating a pure-ZFS system to an encrypted root, I ran into the problem of only the root pool being imported at boot. The boot pool and any other non-root pools remain exported despite being imported when the system was shutdown. This is solved by adding the following to /boot/loader.conf: zpool_cache_load="YES" zpool_cache_name="/boot/zfs/zpool.cache" zpool_cache_type="/boot/zfs/zpool.cache" Why is this not the default? Encrypted ZFS-only systems are broken without it. The only two places those conf lines are mentioned at all: - A few lines in src/usr.sbin/bsdinstall/scripts/zfsboot - https://wiki.freebsd.org/MasonLoringBliss/UEFIandZFSandGELIbyHAND I found that one FreeBSD Wiki article among an ocean of ZFS+GELI-root how-tos and forum posts that don't mention this issue at all. Some claim this "just works", others use a UFS /boot because they date back to 10-R or 9-R, when the UEFI loader didn't speak ZFS.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?721B54CE72A234D51F16BE6F1F81AD643F28E52A>