From owner-freebsd-questions  Tue Feb 27 13:34:37 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA06524
          for questions-outgoing; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 13:34:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA06514
          for <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 13:34:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id OAA05967; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 14:27:56 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199602272127.OAA05967@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: Restricted Shells
To: mcs@vpm.com (Mark Stout)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 14:27:56 -0700 (MST)
Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <199602261927.LAA10285@vpm.com> from "Mark Stout" at Feb 26, 96 11:24:01 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> Is there a restricted Bourne shell for FreeBSD like the one that
> comes with AIX?

Not as part of the base distribution.

It is suggested that you use chroot instead of trusting a shell to
correctly trap all path accesses.

There is an rksh, which is mostly AIX rsh compatible.

There is no "red", so far as I know.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.