Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:38:17 +0200
From:      Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        attilio@FreeBSD.org, Ian Lepore <freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org>, Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: [RFQ] make witness panic an option
Message-ID:  <50A53699.30703@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <47374EC3-5022-49AC-A17E-7F234A88B5C6@bsdimp.com>
References:  <CAJ-Vmo=i=Amo_QqHi4GnGie0Gc0YnK3XaRKjvBO-=SFboFYPmA@mail.gmail.com> <1353001175.1217.153.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <CAJ-FndBP5Pi=SCpyBLK3b=HM_gQ9u8M4%2B1tLk9tA5X-gqismVA@mail.gmail.com> <47374EC3-5022-49AC-A17E-7F234A88B5C6@bsdimp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 15/11/2012 19:56 Warner Losh said the following:
> It sounds like he's more worried about introducing LoRs into his wireless code.

"Mere" LORs do not result in panic, by default.
Only more serious lock-related issues lead to panics.

-- 
Andriy Gapon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50A53699.30703>