From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Apr 14 10:21:00 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA21060 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Tue, 14 Apr 1998 10:21:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.119.24.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA21040; Tue, 14 Apr 1998 17:20:49 GMT (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [194.198.43.36]) by ns1.yes.no (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA04043; Tue, 14 Apr 1998 17:20:48 GMT Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id TAA18507; Tue, 14 Apr 1998 19:20:47 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <19980414191927.51679@follo.net> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 19:19:27 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund To: Mike , "Matthew D. Fuller" Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG, jmb@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: the place of vi References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1i In-Reply-To: ; from Mike on Tue, Apr 14, 1998 at 01:11:35PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Apr 14, 1998 at 01:11:35PM -0400, Mike wrote: > I've just always firmly believed that 'not > knowing' is a great reason to learn... not to whine. Especially on a > -hackers list... where I'd like to think the kernel gurus hang out... Many of them don't, due to too many of these long-winded discussions. (Please don't take this as a flame for raising the issue). > and I'm sure they don't need to hear a discussion of why vi won't work in > single user mode. Absolutely. I actually think we need a freebsd-kernel list, possibly a moderated one. It would be nice to have some place where the kernel hackers would hang out (-current is presently functioning as this, but that is IMHO wrong - it tend to overload that list a bit). Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message