From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 22 18:36:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E5916A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:36:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drop.bsdchat.com (drop.bsdchat.com [209.237.225.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 371EE43D3F for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:36:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from clive@tongi.org) Received: from CARTIER (drag.bsdchat.com [209.237.225.37]) by drop.bsdchat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id j1MIaVDt067691; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:36:34 GMT (envelope-from clive@tongi.org) Received: (nullmailer pid 6731 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:36:15 -0000 Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 02:36:15 +0800 From: Clive Lin To: Doug White Message-ID: <20050222183614.GA1644@tongi.org> References: <1109071079.1390.21.camel@kaiser.sig11.org> <20050222095536.E97883@carver.gumbysoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050222095536.E97883@carver.gumbysoft.com> X-PGP-key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA008C03E User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i cc: Matteo Riondato cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about periodic X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:36:37 -0000 On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 10:06:16AM -0800, Doug White wrote: > Or take the -u out of the default, which I think is the intended behavior, > looking at the commit logs. The daily_status_security_diff_flags option > predates the pf scripts by about 3 months so I'm not sure how that got > past testing :) > > Please send-pr this and poke mlaier and keramida about it. At that time the pf scripts was made, it was solely used on 5.3-RELEASE here. :p (*cough cough*, I see, no excuse.) It looks like pf, ipfw and ipf periodic scripts are all suffering from exactly the same pain. # grep -l new_only 5* 500.ipfwdenied 510.ipfdenied 520.pfdenied -- Clive Tong-I Lin | http://tongi.org | PGP KeyID: A008C03E