From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Dec 19 07:05:33 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id HAA25621 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 07:05:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from maelstrom.CC.McGill.CA (maelstrom.CC.McGill.CA [132.206.35.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id HAA25615 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 07:05:31 -0800 (PST) Received: (from yves@localhost) by maelstrom.CC.McGill.CA (8.7.1/8.6.10) id KAA00925 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 10:05:30 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199612191505.KAA00925@maelstrom.CC.McGill.CA> Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 3.3 v118.2) Received: by NeXT.Mailer (1.118.2) From: Yves Lepage Date: Thu, 19 Dec 96 10:05:24 -0500 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Please, tell me I am wrong Reply-To: yves@CC.McGill.CA Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi all, After my browsing of the various mail archives, I saw a number of things worth mentionning: - NFS on FreeBSD does not support file locking. Maybe it will in the future but it probably won't inter-operate with Sun's. - There isn't a port of smbfs to FreeBSD yet. Does that mean that there is currently no mechanism in FreeBSD that would do the equivalent of a distributed file system that would also do proper file locking? Please, tell me it isn't so and that I missed the references to that great thing that FreeBSD has :-) Thanks a lot, Yves Lepage