Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 13:31:07 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn <gary.jennejohn@freenet.de> To: Marcelo Araujo <araujobsdport@gmail.com> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/lzip Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <20090701133107.4d952dde@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <20090701104451.GA1241@ponderosa.intelbras.com.br> References: <200906301428.n5UESfiF022149@repoman.freebsd.org> <20090701073752.GA79351@FreeBSD.org> <20090701104451.GA1241@ponderosa.intelbras.com.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 07:44:51 -0300 Marcelo Araujo <araujobsdport@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 07:37:53AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 02:28:41PM +0000, Marcelo Araujo wrote: > > > araujo 2009-06-30 14:28:41 UTC > > > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > > > Modified files: > > > archivers/lzip Makefile distinfo > > > Log: > > > - Update to 1.7. > > > > > > PR: based on ports/136003 > > > Submitted by: Sylvio Cesar <scjamorim@bsd.com.br> (maintainer) > > > Approved by: maintainer > > > > Why would maintainer need to explicitly approve their changes? > > Hi danfe, > > It is very easy to answer, because he knows better than me if the new > version is usable or not. The maintainer submitted an update to 1.6, and as > we have a new release, I feel that was better ask the maintainer about that. > > Generally the maintainer knows better than us what is good or not for your > ports. Of course everybody knows that. > When the maintainer submits an update to one of his ports then he rather obviously has also automatically approved the changes. I think that is what danfe was getting at. --- Gary Jennejohn
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090701133107.4d952dde>