From owner-freebsd-security Sun Sep 10 10:02:42 1995 Return-Path: security-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id KAA08454 for security-outgoing; Sun, 10 Sep 1995 10:02:42 -0700 Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [192.216.222.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA08426 for ; Sun, 10 Sep 1995 10:02:39 -0700 Received: from sivka.carrier.kiev.ua (sivka.carrier.kiev.ua [193.125.68.130]) by who.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.11) with ESMTP id KAA20037 for ; Sun, 10 Sep 1995 10:02:16 -0700 Received: from elvisti.kiev.ua (uucp@localhost) by sivka.carrier.kiev.ua (Sendmail 8.who.cares/5) with UUCP id UAA19972 for security@freebsd.org; Sun, 10 Sep 1995 20:02:23 +0300 Received: from office.elvisti.kiev.ua (office.elvisti.kiev.ua [193.125.28.33]) by spider2.elvisti.kiev.ua (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id TAA06944 for ; Sun, 10 Sep 1995 19:02:22 +0300 Received: (from stesin@localhost) by office.elvisti.kiev.ua (8.6.12/8.6.9) id TAA11404; Sun, 10 Sep 1995 19:02:20 +0300 From: "Andrew V. Stesin" Message-Id: <199509101602.TAA11404@office.elvisti.kiev.ua> Subject: Kerberized 'syslog' (was: Do we really need logger(1)? To: roberto@keltia.Freenix.FR (Ollivier Robert) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 1995 19:02:20 +0300 (EET DST) Cc: security@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199509101329.PAA19339@keltia.Freenix.FR> from "Ollivier Robert" at Sep 10, 95 03:29:14 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24alpha5] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 1047 Sender: security-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Dear Ollivier, # It seems that Andrew V. Stesin said: # > Agreed, 100 hundred times agreed. This is The Best Solution (tm) # > because of many issues, like interoperability, design, etc... # > But: where is FreeBSD Kerberos port for us to use, for example, # > in Europe? # # Take the crypto stuff in South Africa (from the FAQ: # # South Africa # skeleton.mikom.csir.co.za:/pub/FreeBSD # # storm.sea.uct.ac.za:/pub/FreeBSD # # it has all the eBones stuff. Alas it is Kerbv4 no eBones for Kerbv5 # :-( # AFAIK this stuff now is in process of integration into the tree, and the legal situation is far of a crystal clearness as well. Please, correct me if I'm wrong. And still no answer: any fault-tolerance features in Kerberized syslod yet? # -- # Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@keltia.frmug.fr.net # FreeBSD keltia.Freenix.FR 2.2-CURRENT #0: Sat Sep 9 17:49:09 MET DST 1995 # -- With best regards -- Andrew Stesin. +380 (44) 2760188 +380 (44) 2713457 +380 (44) 2713560