From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 21 03:49:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7912A106566B; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 03:49:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f173.google.com (mail-wy0-f173.google.com [74.125.82.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B5008FC13; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 03:49:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyh22 with SMTP id 22so1619775wyh.18 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 20:49:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=0BaKfcdTsG/iEgyEOIKMEN96klhafYfiZqxd66yO8O0=; b=wmw+hiY+Lb1U7K9Y7O+46ki3zePxB1rT1xN9AuF7Q25dGBrp1JcpWZ2Jf+WCeq8n6V H8kVY3B42SiNgtj7wtILPxwZyiQ8nwXORaL2+KkbSWrjQ5jJFvfmBwzUyU4x46r7vdQK 6qpGPE3AEdUfNDwd7X3zE8d6c3NvvIWZ+hnZ4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.200.15 with SMTP id eu15mr109043wbb.77.1316575236197; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 20:20:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.96.97 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 20:20:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86ehzbhhv0.fsf@gmail.com> References: <201109200133.p8K1X0r8029934@repoman.freebsd.org> <86ehzbhhv0.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 23:20:36 -0400 Message-ID: From: "b. f." To: h h Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, Brendan Fabeny Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/tor Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bf1783@gmail.com List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 03:49:36 -0000 On 9/20/11, h h wrote: > Brendan Fabeny writes: > >> bf 2011-09-20 01:33:00 UTC >> >> FreeBSD ports repository >> >> Modified files: >> security/tor Makefile >> Log: >> add a few mirrors and mark MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE [1] > > Why not mark port as USE_GMAKE? GNU automake rarely generates makefiles > conforming to BSD make rather than GNU make. And it builds fine with > -j16 when using gmake. > I'm not sure what you're referring to here. The autotools make an attempt to be portable to many different environments, and quite often succeed. Of course, this also depends on the work of those using autotools. There are some issues, like those discussed in the autoconf manual, and some of those are related to the way that parallelism is handled in different make implementations. But I would prefer to avoid adding a dependency on devel/gmake. Maybe you have looked into this, and found the particular Makefile constructs that are preventing parallel builds with the system make in this instance? b.