From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jul 1 18:24:53 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA04857 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 1 Jul 1998 18:24:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA04758 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 1998 18:24:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA15774; Wed, 1 Jul 1998 18:23:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Mikhail Teterin cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/7059 (fwd) In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 01 Jul 1998 13:01:49 EDT." <199807011701.NAA08352@rtfm.ziplink.net> Date: Wed, 01 Jul 1998 18:23:45 -0700 Message-ID: <15770.899342625@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Is this a new policy for a PR database? This is only one of the > PRs I submitted, which are "suspended". It looks suspiciously like > dust that goes under carpet... I understand, there is lack of > time*people to fix them, but why suspend? My understanding is that phk is suspending them in preparation for moving the whole set into a different PR tracking mechanism of some sort. GNATs is not a very good mechanism for maintaining large databases of old PRs and the only alternative seemed to be total abandonment. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message