Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 17:13:49 +0100 From: Matthieu Volat <mazhe@alkumuna.eu> To: Stefan Esser <se@freebsd.org> Cc: Tatsuki Makino <tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com>, FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Working on FLAVOR support in portmaster Message-ID: <20171205171349.4c375805@gramr.alkumuna.eu> In-Reply-To: <e433671c-13b1-26fa-c2e3-550b1a9e52c0@freebsd.org> References: <CAN6yY1ujLFdKpuG4Rxz%2Bfww9gAxTBaY14iCB7RFTkh-oVB1%2B9A@mail.gmail.com> <KL1PR0601MB19922BB1EBA15687D47C4CE2FA3C0@KL1PR0601MB1992.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com> <e433671c-13b1-26fa-c2e3-550b1a9e52c0@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/BHnv34q=ceQJFt8lFmwe=xL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 08:35:55 +0100 Stefan Esser <se@freebsd.org> wrote: > Am 05.12.17 um 00:43 schrieb Tatsuki Makino: > > By the way, where is the clever way to update to flavor? > > I am using portmaster. =20 >=20 > I'm working on FLAVOR support in portmaster. My version did already build > all updated ports, the FLAVOR parameter is passed to build sub-processes, > but there is still some confusion between multiple flavored versions of t= he > same port (installing the py27 version wants to deinstall the py36 version > and vice versa), which I still have to fix. >=20 > I'm not sure that I have time to complete the fix today, but it is not too > hard. Ports need to complement the port origin with the FLAVOR, where > appropriate (e.g. when a flavored destination is found in MOVED). Already > installed packages are annotated with "flavor" and that must be passed to > the build command, when that port is updated. Most other logic in portmas= ter > remains unaffected. >=20 >=20 > My work version has all non PKG_NG support stripped, but that is mainly to > not waste effort fixing irrelevant sub-routines. >=20 > Is it acceptable, to have portmaster stop supporting the old package syst= em? > AFAIK, there is no way that a modern ports tree with flavor support works > with a non-PKG_NG infrastructure? >=20 > Regards, STefan Ho, and here I was, almost ready to request some comments after playing a b= it: https://github.com/freebsd/portmaster/compare/master...mazhe:wip-flavors?= expand=3D1 Regarding old pkg support, wasn't it removed from the repo master branch? --Sig_/BHnv34q=ceQJFt8lFmwe=xL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE1xv/SVkem9252haa3yo2fFz8JX4FAlomxb0ACgkQ3yo2fFz8 JX6j8xAAlP2cwWs0k6felSYkJieVoBJFLTlWvZ60ccF1aeJzZZaF3qmgCgShI2nw no48EXdA5K2L/EsEVRghIgv92/k0QSNGrsvGVsQEpOnvBiqsZk2wCnW0pr6J45bH 7KuzhpmK8Anx/p45maQdEQMvZPDDDKR39aUcPnNEEofMPatTYswD9CAdjXAXw+yc 8lVi67JqzLU48jFFCEuAegOpzUy/CgqILUivcyu3uZNELNX1xjNA2nCuDqkZuM0t SaIXLQwmF4t83+HJNrb9Nhpu2uUIx+UUQi7xCI04U3czVXRVV+88OpS3sTglb6HB 5StxyKGo5z3J7/sGsqVQ95QaQIty1caCuurx/nRiPuKyD4RwPXVcrLsrVY/S14nr w8vBedsca9P4LxTRhJuFcuNLu7cm0f7wLp4ZtXNw2kRzL2btS4oZqlodUQAYYFTT qGF9xWnHXBO0cMG96nK1d83XLav0kKC2sVhLmPKPJnZp7xkOQhNcxuRMbGJDwYP9 As9CUxrSMQ4pRbx/jUPk0YuRIM3DCPjKRfbV3o5u/bmrVXGfbjXqtwyeIebNKyQG YfoCjgleIbKms7QXvASMydnvC6xEIeM1ANMtilLv6YwAzDKQoXeMzSLNLNTQ17u6 /jIBEwgjiH79SGZru4jWHNh9D5pe1v0cmFpKjMpiqnZn8arOnuw= =BbJd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/BHnv34q=ceQJFt8lFmwe=xL--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20171205171349.4c375805>