Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 10:14:08 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Florent Thoumie <flz@xbsd.org> Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, rc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: loopback mounts Message-ID: <44B52DE0.10406@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1152696361.12237.15.camel@mayday.esat.net> References: <86odvwzjjz.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060711155312.GA20418@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <86ac7gqeal.fsf@xps.des.no> <44B3DD71.5090607@FreeBSD.org> <1152696361.12237.15.camel@mayday.esat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Florent Thoumie wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 10:18 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
>>> Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> writes:
>>>> In many ways a mountnoncrit would be the best solution, but that
>>>> would would require some significant work since we'd probably need to
>>>> add an extra fields to fstab [...]
>>> You don't need any extra fields - just add "late" to the options
>>> column and teach mount(8) to ignore it.
>> Another option would be to use a magic number in the pass number field.
>
> Sounds a bit hack-ish :-)
I don't necessarily disagree with you, but it's less dangerous during the
transition than needing a special mount binary that knows how to ignore an
option.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44B52DE0.10406>