From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 19:09:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8616416A46F; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:09:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C568513C4AD; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:09:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEFB2148D; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:09:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:09:16 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: h4YpBHWlVmJLA+gxrIS2phrzWjU2M1lA6936SbGK0IBC 1181675356 Received: from [192.168.123.18] (82-35-112-254.cable.ubr07.dals.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.112.254]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4CFD20AD3; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:09:15 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <466EEF5B.5010807@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:09:15 +0100 From: "Bruce M. Simpson" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070407) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bruce M. Simpson" References: <20070612183708.E31A073069@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <466EEA46.1060803@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <466EEA46.1060803@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: sparc64@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Tinderbox , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:09:21 -0000 Bruce M. Simpson wrote: > > Can anyone spot what is wrong? The psu argument is correct and the > code has built OK on other platforms previously. I merged an earlier version of this file which had the missing & operator. My bad. Sorry for the disruption. regards, BMS