From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 6 14:50:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35ED816A4CE for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 14:50:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [198.92.228.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D237F43D2D for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 14:49:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A04060EA for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 08:49:59 -0600 (CST) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 54092-02 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 08:49:57 -0600 (CST) Received: from [198.92.228.34] (racerx.makeworld.com [198.92.228.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC9D60E7 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 08:49:57 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <42062E94.5070505@makeworld.com> Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 08:49:56 -0600 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050101) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1574286459.20050205120828@wanadoo.fr> <675747489.20050206154301@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <675747489.20050206154301@wanadoo.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic Subject: Re: favor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 14:50:00 -0000 Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Ted Mittelstaedt writes: > > TM> Many content creators take the attitude that any republishing > TM> isn't covered under Fair Use. > > Probably because that attitude is grossly congruent with the law and > jurisprudence. > *** Snip *** After following this thread, does this mean we're all lawyers? -- Best regards, Chris Clearly stated instructions will consistently produce multiple interpretations.