From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 21 05:30:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 153AC1065679 for ; Sun, 21 Dec 2008 05:30:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 041598FC18 for ; Sun, 21 Dec 2008 05:30:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mBL5U3pP057350 for ; Sun, 21 Dec 2008 05:30:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id mBL5U3qF057348; Sun, 21 Dec 2008 05:30:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 05:30:03 GMT Message-Id: <200812210530.mBL5U3qF057348@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Dieter Cc: Subject: Re: kern/118093: firewire bus reset hogs CPU, causing data to be lost X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dieter List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 05:30:04 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/118093; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dieter To: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org, bug-followup@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/118093: firewire bus reset hogs CPU, causing data to be lost Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 21:24:23 +0000 In message <494DAEB1.1070909@miralink.com>, Sean Bruno writes: > I setup my system to execute a bus reset every 1 second, simultaneously, > I started copying a large > file onto the system see if anything would happen. > > I saw no change to copy speed reported by SCP during the entire > transaction. I also see no change > to the system load while this is occurring. Does your system have a RS-232 console or VGA console? The problem might be specific to RS-232. > This seems indicative of "something else" going on. Any idea what this "something else" might be? Does anyone have a clue why my spl calls are returning 0 ?