Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 04:07:30 -0800 (PST) From: Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, mva@freebsd.org Subject: Re: If ports@ list continues to be used as substitute for GNATS, I'm unsubscribing Message-ID: <201312181207.rBIC7SiD013532@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20131218123447.Horde.eGxQRPvmEcSlgsi4V4UKGw1@webmail.df.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Markiyan Kushnir <markiyan.kushnir@gmail.com>: > >There's already ports-bugs@ for issues with ports (see the info on >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs). >And this also would be the correct address for QAT reports, which >are actually spamming the ports@ list (also imho). > >Personally, I do not think that we need yet another list :-). > >Cheers >Marcus +1 Anton
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201312181207.rBIC7SiD013532>