From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Thu Sep 24 13:07:36 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BD73F7145 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 13:07:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BxwLw43Nnz4QYS for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 13:07:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8965A3F7788; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 13:07:36 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8931D3F7773 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 13:07:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BxwLw34blz4QHh for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 13:07:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E4452260B for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 13:07:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 08OD7aK2056404 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 13:07:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 08OD7akx056402 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 13:07:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 249554] x11/libwacom: update to 1.5 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 13:07:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 13:07:36 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D249554 --- Comment #4 from Jan Beich --- Porter's Handbook 5.4.3 wording is fine "as is". It recommends looking at upstream-prepared upload first instead of always relying on automatically generated (via USE_GITHUB). The devil is in the details. For example, upstr= eam python-based projects often exclude tests and sometimes even license file f= rom uploads to PyPI. So which is better depends on a particular port and maintainer's preferences. After ports r527163 there's no "better" and I'm n= ot the maintainer here. If you like bug 249503 why not commit it *separately* from this bug. (In reply to Emmanuel Vadot from comment #3) > What's the problem of using PATCHSITES/PATCH_FILES without USE_GITHUB ? Hardcoding value for GH_ACCOUNT in PATCHSITES i.e., slightly harder to copy-paste from port to port. Bug 249503 actually hardcoded more than necessary: libwacom instead of ${PORTNAME}. > I don't understand the comment on trust on human factor GitHub archives are automatic, based on git-archive(1). In order to comprom= ise them one has to force push or update tag(s). Changing manual releases is le= ss noticible because those are not guaranteed to match whatever is in the repo= and are not part of the distributited nature of Git. > what about trust on github not screwing the generated archives then ? I think it'd be rare due to affecting many repos. GitHub being down happens more often but using manual releases won't help avoid being affected. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=